Wednesday, May 20, 2015

RATE EQUITABILITY!


THE Northern Midlands Council is asking Launceston Airport operators to pay up on more than two years of outstanding rates. 

This is according to the council, which has been seeking a meeting with federal Infrastructure Minister Warren Truss to intervene in the matter for some months. 

Paul Hodgen, general manager of the Launceston Airport, which is owned by Australia Pacific Airports Corporation, said on Tuesday he could not comment because the matter was before the courts ... CLICK HERE READ MORE

There must be sympathy expressed for NMC ratepayers because otherwise, quite apart from the catchup payments of 2 years, it means that rates charged to other ordinary ratepayers will have to increase by 6% to cover the deficit.

Also the value of the Municipal Area as determined by the Valuer General is increased by the improved value of the Launceston Airport hence charges such as the Fire Services Levy charged by the State Government via NMC has to be spread over the remaining ratepayers, yet another deficit.

We also have sympathy for other municipalities such as Launceston, who have more than their fair allocation of non-ratepaying entities such as the University of Tasmania who do not pay the extra charges either, adding $millions to the rate burden of the long-suffering battlers there who pay the highest rates in the country, not to mention the Regional Facilities they fund for the benefit of Northern Tasmania.


Perhaps one day the principle of fairness will be applied across the board in all municipalities?

Lionel Morrell
President, Tasmanian Ratepayers Association Inc
.

1 comment:

Rodger said...

Cash grab
What is the actual cost of the services supplied to the airport? It looks
like the council is benefiting from a cash cow that has grown in the
municipality, with virtually no services.
_____________________
steve Cash grab
Given the council is not getting the money they should be receiving and
getting less than they used to get as stated in the article makes your
comment of benefitting from the cash cow really stupid comment to make
AND
I would imagine the airport gets the same services that all rate payers
receive and is assessed in the same manner, so why should they be exempt or
receive special deals that all householders of the municipality don't get

Isn't always a case of she'll be right and then its not?