Wednesday, March 30, 2016

CITIZENS' PETITION ON UTAS LAND DEAL PRESENTED TO LAUNCESTON COUNCIL

 CLICK ON IMAGES TO ENLARGE
  CLICK ON IMAGES TO ENLARGE

Today the citizen's petition with 1493 signatures calling for a Public Meeting in regard to Council's in commitment to gift land to UTas was presented to the city's General Manager.  The Local Govt. Act 1993 requires Council to call a pub;oc meeting if 5% of the electorate, or 1,000 residents on the electoral roll, call for such a meeting.

Council has 42 days to verify the veracity of the petition. The letter accompanying the petition calls upon Launceston City Council to call a public meeting in accord with SECTION 57 of the Local Government Act 1993 for the purpose of: 
  1. Discussing Council’s decision to gift land known as Willis Street Car Park and the Old Velodrome site to the University of Tasmania; 
  2.  Calling upon Council to rescind the motion passed by the Full Council Meeting 9th November 2015; and to 
  3. Discuss the proposal to place this land on the open market via a Public Auction with a Reserve Price of $5milliion. 
 Furthermore, it is requested that:
  1. The meeting time be 7 PM 
  2.  The meeting be chaired by an independent chairperson; 
  3. Council and spokespeople for the petitioners be given adequate time to state their respective cases – 15 minutes
  4. The meeting accept any motion from the floor for the consideration of Council; 
  5.  Council consider the following people as appropriate independent chair people: Hon. Rosemary Armitage MLC; Hon. Don Wing AM; Hon Kerry Finch MLC; and Hon Ivan Dean MLC.
Given that half as many again signatures are required have been provided there should be no inhibitions in calling the meeting promptly. Indeed, there are many reasons to rethink the whole UTas relocation  proposal given the level of community disquiet.

It has been said that the the number petitioners "is only a small number of people who disagree with Council gifting land to UTas" but in the scheme of things it needs to be considered that:
  • Only three Aldermen won their seats on council with more votes than there are signature on the petition – Ald. van Zetten, McKkenzie and Finlay;
  • Five won their seats with less votes than signatures on the petition;
  • With the other four winning their positions with less than 1,000 votes and three with less than half the number of petitioners. 
  • See http://www.tec.tas.gov.au/LocalGovernmentElections2014/2014LGResults/LauncestonCity.html
  • And only seven aldermen were in attendance to receive the petition.
In any event if the petition makes one point it is that the aldermen, and council by extension, on this issue ate least, are not connected with their constituents and have failed to include their constituents' concerns in their decision making processes.

No comments: